It's hard to reconcile the "anti-consumerist" side of me with this fact: I now own four instant pots.
The first Instant Pot acquisition makes frugal sense: it's a super energy efficient way to make a bunch of things that I'd previous used other, more energy-intensive appliances for. AND it was something I put on a Christmas-wish-list that people who want to buy me stuff could buy, forestalling their buying me things I do *not* want . . . so frugal in that way, too.
The second Instant Pot, also maybe: it was a gift to Nelson back when he was in culinary school, and then when his living situation kept changing, he left it at our home, where we ended up co-opting it and putting it to occasional use alongside Instant Pot number 1.
The third Instant Pot? We're getting into frivolity territory here. I'd semi-justified it because it's different than the other two in two key ways: (1) at 8 quarts, it's larger than the other two which are "only" 6 quarts each, and it has an air fryer attachment. Both features have come in handy at various times, so I have zero regrets, but I also totally admit I'm moving from the realm of sheer practicality into the expanses of luxury.
And the fourth? It matches the first two; I bought it (still in the original box, unused) off of Craigslist, for not-very-much money. Indeed, it had been sitting around on Craigslist for several months, which makes me think that the market for such appliances is becoming saturated. And I bought it for a good, but temporary reason, which is that this semester I'm going to be providing several lunches for 20ish people (maybe as many as 30 people sometimes), and I wanted to do it without incurring the usual trash that comes with ordering delivery -- hence, I want to actually make the food myself. Instant Pots are a fabulous appliance for anyone who wants to set-it-and-forget-it, and so I decided it would be good to have an at-work version of this baby to supplement my three at-home versions.
My at-work Instant Pot, with a large can of plates and a basket of cloth napkins. |
I am pleased to report a resounding success. On Monday, I trotted out the three 6-quart instant pots and had a fabulous book discussion group for 20 people. We ate rice (from one pot) and vegetarian chili (from two other pots). I had a large bin of pretzels and a gallon jug of pickles on the side, and a bit of local cheese as garnish.
One of the fears I have about being frugal is presenting the way I live as somehow inferior, so I was quite nervous about running out of food or about having people judge the food as plain/boring. But in fact, the guests raved about how good the chili was, maybe because I added some cocoa powder, and they loved the brown rice and the shredded cheese that I'd bought in a 7 lb block from a local, organic Amish farmer for half the price of usual store-bought cheese. And we didn't run out -- just the opposite: we had gobs of food left over, with many people taking extras home in their own containers (which I'd urged them to bring). So I got to make people happy and also feel generous, and do it for something like $3/person ($6 per person, if you add in the price of the Craigslist instant pot, although I'll use it for future meals, too, so $3 is more realistic). So, no trash, and yummy food that people got to take along with them, and yet still it was much cheaper than any restaurant I know near us.
Yes!
The old-fashioned way of making things ourselves is still the best way! Good job, and good example!
ReplyDeleteThe next lunch, we'll do baked potatoes. Cross fingers that works well, too!
DeleteI love that. As a frugal person and a nervous hostess, making sure everyone has enough good food to fill them up is my main concern. We've never attempted cooking for more than about 6 other people but the four instapots sounds like the perfect set up for warm food in plenty.
ReplyDeleteIt worked out great! This past week, we did baked (?) potatoes -- I guess, really "steamed" potatoes -- with toppings. Those are filling, for sure!
Delete